Vatnik Soup
Soup number256
Date05.01.2024
Twitter/XRead
Thread Reader AppRead
Thread Reader PDFRead
Audio AppListen
Audio FileListen
ProfessionPolitical scientist
Country of originFinland
Retweets1k
Likes7k
Views552k
Bookmarks
Related soups:

Heikki Patomäki

In today’s #vatniksoup, I’ll introduce a Finnish academic and political scientist, Heikki Patomäki. He’s best-known for his euroskepticism, anti-NATO stance, and for his complete misunderstanding of Vladimir Putin and his regime.

1/16 Image
Patomäki currently works at the Helsinki University as a Professor of Political Science, and he’s also a supervisor of the Doctoral Programme in Political, Societal and Regional Change.

2/16 Image
Previously, he was involved in politics as a member of a Finnish left-wing party Vasemmistoliitto, but resigned in May 2022 after Finland applied to join NATO.

3/16 Image
Patomäki started his political career in the right-wing Youth of the National Coalition Party, but eventually shifted towards the environmentalist greens with strong emphasis on advocating peace.

(text translated from Finnish to English)

4/16 Image
In 2007 he published a book “Uusliberalismi Suomessa” ("Neoliberalism in Finland"), in which he compared neoliberalism to fascism. Incidentally, in his book Patomäki called former Finnish PM Paavo Lipponen, who was involved in the development of Nord Stream, a neoliberal.

5/16
Image
Image
In Sep 2014, he wrote an op-ed on Finnish newspaper Helsingin Sanomat, in which he criticised the sanctions set against Russia after the annexation of Crimea. He also blamed NATO expansion and EU’s collaboration offers to Ukraine for the conflict.

6/16 Image
In 2015, he stated that Putin’s Russia “completely lacks Hitler’s racist ideology, which led to genocide.” In retrospect, we can clearly see that Professor Patomäki was dead wrong on this.

7/16


Image
Image
Image
Image
In the same interview, he also stated that Russia under Putin is “still a liberal democracy that respects human rights”. At this point, Putin had already murdered and imprisoned several journalists in Russia and assassinated many of its own citizens abroad.

8/16
Image
Image
To me it seems like Patomäki observes geopolitics through a Mearsheimerian lense of offensive realism, where empires have their “spheres of influence, ” and smaller, sovereign nations just have to obey their “masters”:



9/16
In an interview on 5 January 2024, Patomäki stated that peace in Ukraine can only be achieved if they give up their goals of joining NATO. He also stated that the regions invaded by Russia should be controlled by the UN, and that their fate should be decided through...

10/16 Image
..diplomacy & by holding a referendum. By his view, Ukraine’s willingness to join NATO was the “red line” that started the war.He also repeated the myth over the West “sabotaging the peace talks”, even though Russia controlled large area of Ukraine & had no desire for peace.
11/16


Image
Image
Image
Image
According to Patomäki, Ukraine can’t win even if they got full support from the West, even though Ukraine has been defending bravely against Russia’s meat waves for almost 700 days now, and even re-captured several areas like Kharkiv and Kherson.

12/16

Image
Image
Image
He admits, that even if there is an agreement on truce, there are no guarantees for permanent peace. Many have speculated, that Russia would use this time to re-group and eventually attack Ukraine again.

As a reminder, there was a SECOND Chechen War, after all.

13/16

Image
Image
Image
Finally, the Professor criticises the Finnish discussion culture revolving around the Russo-Ukrainian War. He claims that the “public debate in Finland is not in a very good place at the moment, ” suggesting that you’re not allowed to “disagree with the mainstream opinion”.

14/16 Image
In my view, Mr. Patomäki just has difficulties to see Russia as it is: an authoritarian and genocidal empire trying to expand its borders slowly but surely:



15/16
And all this talk about the suppression of different opinions was published in the second biggest yellow press magazine Iltalehti.

Does the Professor think that this would be possible in Russia, that according to him, is a “liberal democracy that respects human rights”?

16/16 Image
I have paused personal donations for now, please support @U24_gov_ua by donating to the #HopakChallenge and sending me the receipt:

Related soups
Previous soup: Andrew and Tristan TateNext soup: Forum voor Democratie (FvD)